Notes
September 2025
Note (2025-09-24 22:27)
“Small Acts of Good, US as Third World Country, and How Culture Changes”:
For humans, it is another reminder we don’t help animals for them, but for us – to try and give our own pointless lives a little more meaning.
While we do help animals primarily to make us feel good, we do that because it is a reminder that there is a point to life, which isn’t grounded in the rational, but in the spiritual. Those daily acts of small “irrationality” are attempts to maintain our soul in an overly rational dehumanizing world.
These little acts of good, towards frogs, but especially towards other humans, is a part of us that speaks towards high purpose. Yes, I will use saving a tiny frog to imply the sacred dimension of existence.
Note (2025-09-24 20:00)
天下的性质不是世界主义(cosmopolitan)的政治正确秩序,而是为文明建立一种宇宙论式(cosmological)的生态系统秩序,考虑的重点是文明的生态安全,试图把世界变成每种生活方式和每种文化之间互相安全的系统,重点在“关系”的生态而不在“个人”的身份。最简略地说,天下体系是对亨廷顿的文明冲突问题的一个可能解。天下并不许诺类似神话的乌托邦(utopia),而是可实现的共托邦(contopia)。
从前人类有过多种“世界性”的努力,比如世界性的帝国、普世宗教、普世价值观、世界语之类,都失败了,其失败自有多种历史原因,但本质原因在于那些传统的世界性努力都属于单边主义的推广,只是单边之“化”而不是“互化”,即使一时成功也最终失败。孔子以为“名正言顺”就能够“事成”,现代政治学也以为“证成”的观念(justified,类似“名正言顺”的意思)就能够推广,这些传统理论都忽视了主体间性的根本难题是“他人不同意”,而“不同意”不需要也不服从名正言顺的理由。这是“他心”问题的极端形式。假如跨主体性能够成为一种解决方式,就需要发现能够形成“跨越”效果的方法,但似乎还没有发现充分有效的方法,因为“他心”有着难以进入的超越性。
Note (2025-09-21 23:29)
Note (2025-09-21 20:01)
Sappho. How to Be Queer: An Ancient Guide to Sexuality. Edited and translated by Sarah Nooter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024.
In the words of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, queer “can refer to: the open mesh of possibilities, gaps, overlaps, dissonances and resonances, lapses and excesses of meaning when the constituent elements of anyone’s gender, of anyone’s sexuality aren’t made (or can’t be made) to signify monolithically.”
Eros is above all a feeling so powerful that it is understood as divine, an affective force that draws people away from what is demanded of them by institutions and establishments, and toward an experience of fervent vitality.
A delicate fire
runs under my skin, my eyes
see nothing, my ears
roar,
cold sweat pours down me, and trembling
seizes me all over, and I am greener than grass.
A boy and a horse have a similar mind. For a horse
does not weep when his rider lies in the dust,
but just carries another man, once glutted on fodder.
For whoever labors for the love of a boy must, in essence,
put his hand over a quickly burning flame.
Blessed is he who, in love with a boy, does not know the sea,
and for whom night coming over the ocean is not a care.
For the vision of the mind begins to look sharp only when that of the eyes starts to abate from its peak.
Note (2025-09-20 22:37)
The virus of whataboutism produces at least two symptoms. On the one hand, it fosters apathy: if any form of criticism is just seen as hypocrisy, then what is the point of having endless discussions? When does one become qualified to criticise? On the other hand, it blinds by obscuring basic similarities, muddying the water and making it difficult to identify actual commonalities that extend beyond national borders and are inherent to the organisation of the global economy in our current stage of late capitalism.
The pervasiveness of the whataboutist virus also produces a powerful hyperactive immune response in the China debate that manifests itself as the very opposite of whataboutism—i.e. a complete dismissal of any attempt to find similarities between dynamics in China and elsewhere. This is a form of argumentation that can be defined as ‘essentialism’, in that it tends to emphasise the set of attributes specific to a certain context as its defining elements, a line of reasoning eerily reminiscent of the debates over China’s ‘national character’ (国民性) that raged in China and the West a century ago.
Essentialism also produces a myopic outlook, and often manifests as self-righteous outrage at any suggestion that there might be more to the picture than what immediately meets the eye. From this perspective, there can be no linkages, seepages, or parallels between liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes. China must be analysed in isolation, and any analysis must identify the authoritarianism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as the only constant underpinning all problems.
As easy as it is to lay the blame for all this on China—and undeniable as it is that the Chinese government is playing an important role in all this—these trends are not emanating solely from one country. Rather, what is happening in China is just one dramatic manifestation of global phenomena—phenomena that are, in turn, shaped by broader forces. For this reason, we need to go beyond essentialist and whataboutist approaches and carefully document (and denounce) what is happening in China, while also highlighting the ways in which Chinese developments link up with events elsewhere.
Note (2025-09-19 19:51)
Note (2025-09-19 07:21)
Note (2025-09-19 01:19)
like comfort foods there are comfort songs that you keep returning to when you just need something to fill in
Note (2025-09-18 19:43)
Note (2025-09-07 07:19)
reason to obey your mother’s order: was in the wild right before sunset when she texted today is 七月半 don’t go out after dark and be home before 9. i was like hahaha too late never mind. then i got semi-lost climbing up a stream and cut my thumb, which then failed the fingerprint match at the border check when i returned at 11
Note (2025-09-04 20:21)
“look at the precipice with awe and rejoice in the proximity”
Note (2025-09-02 20:32)
August 2025
Note (2025-08-28 07:26)
Note (2025-08-27 12:19)
my recent litany against escalation: i might as well shut up
Note (2025-08-24 22:29)
Note (2025-08-23 09:39)
三点五十醒了,刷完了 feed,写了会东西,把 gpt 聊到了 quota,游了泳骑了车,吃了两顿,高兴了一会也自闭了一会,现在开始想今天怎么还没过完,或者今天已经过完了
Note (2025-08-22 17:13)
Note (2025-08-22 06:57)
Note (2025-08-22 01:34)
Note (2025-08-20 08:54)
也不知道老中为什么这么执着于把谢谢合作翻译成 thank you for your cooperation 在谢谢合作的语境里谢谢的如果不是合作难道还能是不合作吗
Note (2025-08-15 01:53)
Note (2025-08-12 21:39)
Note (2025-08-10 21:19)
下了个轨迹没仔细看只扫到说最后会经过墓地我想经过就经过吧不忌讳这个结果最后发现是从占了一整面山坡的墓地中间穿过 我就像?一边默念对不起打扰了一边灰头土脸走下去最后发现到了八年前打工住的地方当时每天路过就是没有往上坡瞅一眼 我就像??
Note (2025-08-08 09:03)
gpt-5 may be a flop in terms of intelligence but it does have apparently fixed sycophancy; a dozen messages into the chat there were already a handful of responses that made me like okay that’s straightforward/inhospitable (which was a plus thou)
Note (2025-08-06 18:59)
Batch Downloading and Transcribing Podcast Episodes hsu.cy/2025/08/poddl















